MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560951148 · doi:10.2196/iproc.6080

Lower Risk of Home Hemodialysis Attrition in Patients Using Nx2me Connected Health Technology

2016· article· en· W2560951148 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
José Molina, Paul Kravitz, Eric D. Weinhandl

Bibliographic record

VenueIproceedings · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemodialysisMedicineHome hemodialysisPsychosocialDialysisAttritionTelemedicineTelehealthQuality of life (healthcare)Intensive care medicineBlood pressureSession (web analytics)Health careInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Home hemodialysis is a growing treatment modality for end-stage renal disease. Home hemodialysis facilitates increased treatment frequency, which may reduce intradialytic symptoms, decrease risk of cardiovascular morbidity, and improve quality of life. However, patients may elect to discontinue home hemodialysis for medical or psychosocial reasons and to convert to in-center hemodialysis. Tools that improve communication and coordination between patients and providers and reduce therapy burden on patients may reduce risk of attrition. Nx2me Connected Health (NxStage Medical, Inc, Lawrence, MA) is a telehealth platform that collects NxStage System One cycler data and patient factors (eg, blood pressure, weight), transmits data to providers after each dialysis session, and enables providers to review data in the Nx2me Clinician Portal regularly; in contrast, usual care involves monthly review of patient-completed session records on paper. Objective: To assess whether use of Nx2me Connected Health was associated with reduced risk of home hemodialysis attrition in patients on the System One cycler. Methods: We collected data from home hemodialysis patients that initiated use of Nx2me Connected Health. At first use of Nx2me, we identified cumulative time with the System One cycler and treatment setting (in-center training or home). From NxStage records, we identified 3 matched controls for each Nx2me user. Specifically, for a Nx2me user who had accumulated t days with the System One cycler at first use of Nx2me, we identified potential controls who had also accumulated at least t days with the System One cycler (without use of Nx2me) and retained those in the same treatment setting as the Nx2me user at t days after first use of the System One cycler. We randomly selected 3 matched controls from this subset. We followed Nx2me users and matched controls until home hemodialysis attrition and classified the cause of attrition as non-controllable (due to transplant or death) or controllable (due to health issues, therapy burden, or other reasons). We used Fine-Gray competing-risks regression to model incidence of attrition, with stratification by matched cluster and adjustment for race, vascular access modality, and number of dialysis sessions per week. Results: We identified 401 Nx2me users (cumulative follow-up years, 356) and 1203 matched controls (1111). Crude attrition rates in Nx2me users and matched controls were 39.6 and 50.6 stops per 100 patient-years, respectively. For Nx2me users versus matched controls, adjusted hazard ratios of attrition due to controllable causes were 0.64 (95% CI 0.49-0.83) overall and 0.52 (95% CI 0.36-0.76) in the subset of patients with <3 months on the System One cycler at first use of Nx2me (and their respective matched controls). In contrast, adjusted hazard ratios of attrition due to non-controllable causes were 1.09 (95% CI 0.79-1.51) overall and 1.01 (95% CI 0.55-1.84) in the aforementioned subset. Conclusions: Use of Nx2me Connected Health reduced risk of home hemodialysis attrition due to health issues, therapy burden, and other reasons that ordinarily lead to conversion to in-center hemodialysis. The magnitude of risk reduction was larger in patients who initiated use of Nx2me shortly after first treatment with the NxStage System One cycler.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIproceedingsSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207