MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560981026 · doi:10.25071/1916-4467.40308

Provoking Curriculum as Inspirited Topographies: Frontispiece

2016· article· en· W2560981026 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Darlene E St Georges

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumTheme (computing)PolyphonyThe artsSociologyWork (physics)Visual artsPedagogyArtComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This arts-integrated work, "Root," reflects one of the sub-themes -- Provoking Curriculum as Inspirited Topographies -- of this special issue of JCACS. The theme and title of this special issue is "Canadian Curriculum Studies: A Métissage of Polyphonic Textualities."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum StudiesSame topicArt Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207