MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2561001488 · doi:10.1109/crv.2016.70

KinectScenes: Robust Real-Time RGB-D Fusion for Animal Behavioural Monitoring

2016· article· en· W2561001488 on OpenAlexaff
Logan Jeya, John Zelek

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRGB color modelComputer visionArtificial intelligencePoint cloudPipeline (software)Tracking (education)Video trackingSensor fusionReal-time computingComputer graphics (images)Object (grammar)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Animal Behavioural Monitoring requires near real-time and robust scene information. State of art methods to construct a complete RGB-D video of a scene are typically slow, or done offline and often both computationally and monetarily expensive. In this paper, we present a near real-time method called KinectScenes that fuses N RGB-D point clouds acquired from statically positioned commodity hardware to reconstruct large & complete dynamic 3D scenes. Specifically, we introduce a pipeline that fuses RGB-D sensor data to generate a spatio-temporal coherent 3D free viewpoint video with near 360° purview -- only limited by the number and placement of the sensors. KinectScenes differentiates from existing state of art in that 1. It is near real-time: 7~15 fps, and 2. It remains unperturbed to minute motion of the static sensors. In addition, we contribute a new dataset of RGB-D scenes to the research community as to enable rapid progress for behavioral tracking research. Applications include precise human and animal behavioral tracking, inexpensive VR scene generation, object recognition and interaction. Early results demonstrate that KinectScenes is both efficient in near real-time and can densely and richly reconstruct a given dynamic scene using 3 sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207