A Revised and Expanded Structure Hierarchy of Natural and Synthetic Hexavalent Uranium Compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Over the past four decades, the number of inorganic oxide and oxy-salt phases containing stoichiometric quantities of hexavalent uranium has increased exponentially from a few dozen to well over 700, and these structures have become well-known for their remarkable compositional diversity and topological variability. Considering the entirety of these compounds ( i . e ., crystal structures, conditions of synthesis, and geological occurrences) offers significant insight into the behavior of uranium in the solid state and in the nascent (typically aqueous) fluids. The structure hierarchy approach adopted here aims specifically to facilitate the recognition of useful patterns in the crystal-chemical behavior of hexavalent uranium (U 6+ ). This work represents the third attempt at a structure hierarchy of U 6+ compounds, with the first two being those of Burns et al . (1996) and Burns (2005), which considered 180 and 368 structures, respectively. The current work is expanded to include the structures of 727 known, well-refined synthetic compounds (610) and minerals (117) that contain stoichiometric quantities of U 6+ . As in the previous works, structures are systematically ordered on the basis of topological similarity, as defined predominantly by the polymerization of high-valence cations. The updated breakdown is as follows: (1) isolated polyhedra (24 compounds/0 minerals); (2) finite clusters (70 compounds/10 minerals); (3) infinite chains (94 compounds/15 minerals); (4) infinite sheets (353 compounds/79 minerals); and (5) frameworks (186 compounds/13 minerals). Within each of these major categories, structures are sub-divided on the basis of increasing connectivity of uranium (nearly always uranyl) polyhedra. In addition to elucidating common trends in U 6+ crystal chemistry, this structure hierarchy will serve as a comprehensive introduction for those not yet fluent in the domain of uranium mineralogy and inorganic, synthetic uranium chemistry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".