MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2561054757 · doi:10.1111/jvs.12485

Effects of coarse woody debris on plant and lichen species composition in boreal forests

2016· article· en· W2561054757 on OpenAlex
Praveen Kumar, Han Y. H. Chen, Sean C. Thomas, Chander Shahi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vegetation Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCoarse woody debrisUnderstoryTaigaEcologyOrdinationForest floorVegetation (pathology)SnagSpecies diversityPicea abiesBiologyBorealCanopyEnvironmental scienceHabitatEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Question Although the importance of coarse woody debris ( CWD ) for understorey species diversity has been recognized, the relative effects of coarse woody debris decay class and substrate species on understorey species composition have received little attention. We examined how the species composition of understorey vegetation change with CWD decay class and substrate species. Location Boreal mixed‐wood forests, Ontario, Canada. Methods To cover a wide range of CWD decay classes and substrate species, we sampled fire‐origin boreal forest stands that varied in stand age and canopy tree species composition. Vegetation on CWD was sampled by visually estimating percentage cover of each species within a 0.1 m × 0.5 m quadrat, randomly laid lengthwise on top of each sampled CWD log. We also recorded the forest floor vegetation by establishing an adjacent plot of the same size at a distance of 1.0 m in a random direction from the CWD vegetation sample. Results Multivariate analysis showed that understorey species composition differed among decay classes and substrate species. A NMDS ordination of understorey species composition revealed a clear separation of decay classes 1 and 2 from higher decay classes, and that decay classes 4 and 5 shared several species with the forest floor. The species composition on the forest floor was completely different from the species composition on CWD decay classes 1, 2 and 3. Two distinct groupings of substrates according to CWD species composition were found: conifer species ( Pinus banksiana and Picea spp.) and broad‐leaf species ( Betula papyrifera and Populus spp.), with Abies balsamea taking an intermediate position. Indicator species analysis showed distinct understorey species affiliations to substrate species at advanced decay classes. Understorey species composition on the CWD of P. banksiana showed particularly pronounced changes from the dominance of lichens on decay classes 2 and 3 to dominance by mosses and vascular species on decay classes 4 and 5. Conclusions Understorey species composition on CWD not only differed with decay class, but also with CWD substrate species. Conservation strategies should aim at retaining diversity of CWD in terms of both decay classes and species composition in boreal forests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it