Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entre 1770 et 1800 se diffuse en Allemagne un ensemble de réflexions concernant l’art et la subjectivité. C’est la philosophie du romantisme. Elle amorce la transformation révolutionnaire européenne. L’essor intellectuel allemand commence par un dialogue avec les Lumières françaises chez Lessing, Herder et leurs successeurs avant de s’infléchir en une réflexion sur l’originalité des expressions culturelles. Radicalisée par Kant, Schelling ou Goethe, cette pensée de la subjectivité, où l’esthétique voisine avec la morale et la métaphysique, englobe la littérature, la philosophie et la religion. Par ses aspirations comme par ses conséquences, elle a modelé la modernité et a ouvert la voie aux formes d’action communicationnelle de cénacles spécialisés dont nos interactions numériques ont retrouvé le fil. Après ce premier article présentant ce mouvement culturel européen, un second traitera de la philosophie du romantisme allemand et de sa transformation académique avant qu’un troisième esquisse le passage de la dialectique au numérique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".