MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2561387053 · doi:10.1353/lut.2016.0107

Fruit for the Soul: Luther on the Lament Psalms by Dennis Ngien

2016· article· en· W2561387053 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Troy M. Troftgruben

Bibliographic record

VenueLutheran quarterly · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLamentSoulTheologyPhilosophyConfession (law)FaithMartin lutherConsolationInterpretation (philosophy)History

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Fruit for the Soul: Luther on the Lament Psalms by Dennis Ngien Troy M. Troftgruben Fruit for the Soul: Luther on the Lament Psalms. By Dennis Ngien. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2015. xxxiv + 339 pp. Dennis Ngien is professor of systematic theology at Tyndale University College and Seminary in Toronto, as well as research professor at Wycliffe College (University of Toronto). Many of his books correlate theological studies with spirituality (e.g., Gifted Response, 2008)—a characteristic true also of his work on Luther (e.g., Luther as a Spiritual Adviser, 2007). In this book Ngien explores Luther’s interpretation of six lament Psalms, drawing attention to his theology, pastoral disposition, and appreciation for the Psalter. Thus, the book aims “to help the wider audience experience the riches of the Psalms” and thereby “reap holy fruits for the care of the soul” (xxxiii). After a foreword (by Robert Kolb) and an introduction, the book includes six chapters, a conclusion, bibliography, and closing indices. Chapter one (on Psalm 6) emphasizes the consolation believers experience in suffering, according to Luther. Since the Christian life is lived under a theology of the cross, trials result in a poverty of spirit that allows space for “God’s embraces” (23). Chapter two (on Psalm 51) explores Luther’s reflections on confession, the spoken Word, justification, the revealed (vs. the hidden) God, and faith (vs. despair). Dynamics as these enable the Christian to experience God’s embrace “in the lap of God’s mercy” (LW 12.327). Chapter 3 (on Psalm 77) describes Luther’s concept of “meditation” as a progression from remembrance and remorse to joy and public praise. Chapter four characterizes Psalm 90 as “Mosaic” in how it reveals sin and death. In response, Luther depicts sighing as a prayer of faith that leads to mercy and joy. Chapter five focuses on an imprecatory Psalm (94), which describes God’s “alien work” of allowing oppression. Contrary to reason, faith perceives divine consolation hidden in suffering, changing the basis of complaint into a reason for God’s praise. Chapter six engages a “beloved” Psalm of Luther’s (118), reflecting on distress and prayer and the natural progression from pleading to thanksgiving. The conclusion depicts the entire book as “an exercise of the theology of the cross” (299): the believer’s experiences of temptation and loss reflect the way of the cross and lead all the more to trust in the God revealed in Christ. [End Page 473] Ngien’s book is an excellent entry into the interpretive mind of Luther. Not simply a commentary on Luther’s commentary, the book deliberately explores Luther’s theology at work in his exegesis, with pertinent historical background and appreciation for his pastoral demeanor. The book draws appropriately on Luther scholars (e.g., Forde, Wengert, Lohse, Paulson, Bayer), emphasizing that Luther’s work on lament Psalms deserves more attention. Ngien’s intended audience, however, is not scholars but “the nonspecialist, more advanced theological students, pastors, and teachers in churches” (xxxiii). Toward this end, scholarly dialogue is moderate and explanations of theological ideas more pronounced. At points the book feels meandering, since no logical progression guides each chapter’s discussions of history, theology, and exegesis. (Including each chapter’s respective Psalm text would help, as would chapter outlines.) But this approach reflects Luther’s exegetical style, making it, arguably, fitting. Still, this and the book’s focus on theological themes make it more likely to appeal to readers already acquainted with and appreciative of Luther and his theology. As implied by the title, the book theoretically focuses less on Luther’s historic interpretive approach and more on “the fruits one could reap from it for the care of the soul” (26). In practice it primarily discusses Luther’s theology in historical perspective, not issues of contemporary spirituality. This work offers an authentic experience of Luther’s interpretive mind at work, with explicit connections to his theology and pastoral vocation. Ngien’s book is an articulate and informed work on Luther’s Psalter exegesis that will stimulate theologically trained Lutherans and revive attention to Luther’s appreciation for lamentation. Troy M. Troftgruben Wartburg Theological Seminary, Dubuque, Iowa Copyright © 2016 Johns Hopkins...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLutheran quarterlySame topicReformation and Early Modern ChristianityFrench-language works237,207