MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2561391874

Family of Empires: The Pisanis in the Ottoman and British Empires.

2016· article· en· W2561391874 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDeep Blue (University of Michigan) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaHorace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of MichiganDurham UniversityEuropean CommissionUniversity of Michigan
KeywordsAncient historyHistoryOttoman empireGenealogyPolitical scienceLawPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Operating at the intersections of diplomacy, the Ottoman Empire and Europe, and the Muslim and non-Muslim communities in Istanbul, the Pisanis were a prolific family of dragomans with many members employed by the British Embassy in Istanbul in the nineteenth century. These non-Muslim interpreters and translators were intermediaries who facilitated diplomatic relations between Britain and the Ottoman Empire, and acted as brokers that bridged two worlds. Apart from the world of diplomacy, the Pisanis were a well-connected family whose members excelled in Istanbul’s Levantine community, and participated in a wide range of enterprises. But by virtue of family members’ occupation as dragomans, extra-territorial legal protection gained by their employment at the embassy, and membership in the Levantine community, the Pisanis, and dragomans in general, are often considered to be actors that were “in-between” empires. This dissertation revises that narrative and argues that the Pisanis were anything but in-between empires, and were rather firmly embedded in both the Ottoman Empire and British Empire. To do so, this study reconstructs their family history and social networks, their public activities in their roles as dragomans and their private activities as non-Muslim Ottoman subjects to examine how members of this family operated within Ottoman and British imperial spaces. In discussing the lives of the Pisanis, this dissertation intervenes in scholarly debates on non-Muslims living and operating in the Ottoman Empire by providing insight from the bottom up on the opportunities provided for this family, and what they did with them. It charts the tactics used to conserve their position in the embassy, the difference in self-representations of their identity among family members, and their use of British and Ottoman institutions to shape their lives within these empires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it