Renegades: J.L. Cohen, Bill Walsh, and the Tragedies of the Canadian Left
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Very Red Life: The Story of Bill Walsh. Cy Gonick. St. John's, Newfoundland: Canadian Committee on Labour History, 2001. Renegade Lawyer: The Life of I.L. Cohen. Laurel Sefton MacDowell. Toronto: Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History/University of Toronto Press, 2001. These books narrate the lives of two men. They shared much. Both were born the sons of Jewish immigrant families newly-arrived to Canada in the first decade of the last century. Anti-semitism was not something they could escape, yet they were the archetypal, secularized non-Jewish Jews and invested little in identifications with either the orthodox religious beliefs or standard institutional life of the traditional Jewish community.1 Growing to adulthood, they proved to be perfectionists, tough taskmasters with whom it was difficult to undertake common projects. Workaholics, they expected as much from everyone around them as they themselves were perpetually prepared to give. Publicly men of the left, their private lives were something of a closed book, entry to which was rarely granted. Over the course of careers reaching from the 1920s to the 1990s, these two individuals embraced political views and causes often associated with the Communist Party, an institution that was anything but celebrated during the Cold War witch-hunt atmosphere of the 1940s; tarred with the brush of anti-communism on a number of occasions, both men suffered through the ways its pitch could sear a reputation. Sustained by devoted wives, this duo nevertheless placed family behind the travails of the moment, and were seldom at home when office work, appearances and activities in distant cities, or a crisis involving one union or another, demanded their attention. Both were present at the founding of the modern Canadian labour movement and at significant points in the twentieth-century history of struggles over civil liberties and political freedoms of speech. They were architects and workers within what has come to be known as the post-war settlement, a system of industrial relations and collective bargaining rights that put modern unionism in Canada's late 1940s on a secure footing for the first time in history. Makers of this history, they were also its victims. Difficult men, they reaped what they had sown, albeit not always in ways that they deserved or even seemed to entirely understand. Ironically enough the most well-known and affluent of these two men, pioneering labour lawyer, Jacob Lawrence Cohen, known to close friends and family as Jack and to his largely trade union clientele as J.L., came from the more impoverished background. When his mother was widowed prematurely at the age of 34, young Jack, the eldest son of 13 years, was thrust into the role of family breadwinner. As he provided for his mother and five siblings, Jack felt the weight of his father's demise. A portion of his conscious childhood was forever lost as Jack occupied the rank of surrogate father, bookkeeping to earn money and then clerking in a law office, a job that springboarded him into the profession at which he would eventually excel. No time was wasted on frivolities, and by the time he was 16 Cohen was making the important decisions for the family, a responsibility which undoubtedly contributed to the making of a somewhat authoritarian, patriarchal personality. Poor and Jewish, Cohen broke into the society and business of law with elan, distinguishing himself by graduating third in his Osgoode Hall Law School class, in spite of having no university preparation. Over the course of the 1920s, although his law practice was conventional enough, Cohen was notably different: anti-semitism in Toronto was sufficiently commonplace that his clients were largely Jewish, and mostly confined to the businesses of the garment sector. Contacts in New York, a center of Jewish business and culture, led to his courtship of a Russian Jewish social worker, Dorothy Aidman, whom Cohen married in 1923. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".