MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2561451097 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-605

Abstract 605: The clinical outcome of patients with FOXL2 402C->G mutation positive adult-type Granulosa Cell Tumor of the ovary - a population based study with analysis of tissue and plasma ctDNA

2015· article· en· W2561451097 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anniina Färkkilä, Melissa K. McConechy, Winnie Yang, Nirit Rozenberg, Noora Andersson, Leila Unkila‐Kallio, Ralf Bützow, C. Blake Gilks, David G. Huntsman, Mikko Anttonen

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationMedicineInternal medicinePathologyOvaryHistopathologyOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Adult-type Granulosa Cell Tumors (AGCTs) are rare ovarian neoplasms comprising of 5% of all ovarian cancers. The FOXL2 (C->G) C134W mutation has been identified in 95% of all AGCTs, making it a pathognomonic defining feature. The histological diagnosis of AGCT is challenging; false diagnoses have been reported in up to 30-50% of cases in historical series. AGCTs behave unpredictably, and recurrences occur in 30-60% of the patients. The clinical outcome of molecularly defined, FOXL2-mutation positive AGCTs remains unknown. We conducted a partially prospective, population-based study of 248 AGCT patients diagnosed or treated at Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland, during 3/1956-10/2013. Clinical data were collected from hospital records and the causes of death from the Finnish Causes of Death registry. FOXL2 mutation was analyzed from DNA extracted from FFPE (n = 171), and fresh tumor tissue samples (n = 51). Histological diagnosis was re-evaluated in Helsinki, and differential diagnostic cases (n = 24) were subjected to a blinded histological review in Vancouver. Serial plasma samples (n = 120) were collected prospectively during 8/2007- 4/2013 from 37 AGCT patients. The extracted ctDNA was preamplified using the C134W FOXL2 Taqman primer/probe. Tissue and plasma DNA were analyzed with Raindance Raindrop digital PCR technology. Statistical analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier, and comparison of ctDNA positivity to tumor diameter with oneway ANOVA using JMP software. Of the original cohort, 165 (74%) tumors were positive and 57 (26%) tumors were negative for the FOXL2 402C->G mutation. Upon pathological review, an alternate diagnosis was set for 35 mutation negative patients in the first review (Helsinki), and for 41 patients in the final review (Vancouver). The vast majority (n = 149, 90%) of the FOXL2 mutation positive AGCT patients were diagnosed at stage I. The 5-, 10, and 15-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 99%, and 93%, and 89% for the FOXL2 positive AGCT patients, compared to 58%, 53%, and 51% for the FOXL2 wild-type/misdiagnosed other tumors (p<0.0001, log-rank test). 51 (31%) of the FOXL2 positive AGCT patients had a recurrence at a median time of 7.6 years (range 1-26 years) after the diagnosis. FOXL2 mutation was detected in the plasma of 17% (n = 8) of samples from patients with primary or recurrent AGCT. ctDNA FOXL2 mutation was more likely detected in patients with large tumors (p = 0.003). We have characterized the largest population based cohort of AGCT patients, and shown that the outcome of the patients with FOXL2 mutation positive AGCT was superior to those with original AGCT misdiagnosis. ctDNA is a promising tool to diagnose AGCT in a non-invasive manner. Testing FOXL2 mutation should be used as standard of care, especially in differential diagnostic cases. Citation Format: Anniina Färkkilä, Melissa K. McConechy, Winnie Yang,, Nirit Rozenberg, Noora Andersson, Leila Unkila-Kallio, Ralf Bützow, Blake Gilks, David G. Huntsman, Mikko Anttonen. The clinical outcome of patients with FOXL2 402C->G mutation positive adult-type Granulosa Cell Tumor of the ovary - a population based study with analysis of tissue and plasma ctDNA. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 605. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-605

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment→French-language works237,207→