MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2561479353 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-2562

Abstract 2562: Dianhydrogalactitol inhibits the growth of glioma stem and non-stem cultures, including temozolomide-resistant cell lines, in vitro and in vivo

2015· article· en· W2561479353 on OpenAlexaff
Shaun D. Fouse, Anne Steinø, Nicholas Butowski, Jeffrey Bacha, Sarath Kanekal, Nancy Dos Santos, Dennis Brown, J Costello

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomideMethyltransferaseCancer researchIn vivoGliomaDNA repairCancer stem cellStem cellMedicineDacarbazineCancerBiologyInternal medicineMethylationMelanomaDNAGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The standard of care for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients is surgical resection followed by temozolomide (TMZ) and irradiation (XRT). However, TMZ-resistance has emerged as a significant unmet medical need, as DNA repair enzyme 0-6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) removes the methyl-group adducts caused by TMZ. Dianhydrogalactitol (VAL-083) is a structurally unique alkylating agent causing DNA crosslinks at N7 position of guanine. Because VAL-083's N7 adducts are not subject to MGMT mediated repair, it may be an effective chemotherapeutic in the treatment of TMZ-resistant GBM. VAL-083 crosses the blood brain barrier and accumulates in brain tumor tissue. We have recently shown that TMZ activity is similar in cancer stem cells (CSC) and their paired non-CSC from primary GBM tissues, and that the activity is MGMT-dependent. We thus sought to investigate how our CSC and non-CSC panel would respond to VAL-083 alone or in combination with XRT. We further investigated the activity of VAL-083 in in vivo models of drug-resistant GBM in comparison to TMZ. Rag2 mice bearing intracranial human GBM xenograft tumors of either MGMT-positive and TMZ-resistant origin (BT74), or MGMT-negative and TMZ-sensitive origin (U251) were treated. VAL-083 was given i.p. 3 times/week x 3 weeks, and the efficacy of VAL-083 in controlling tumor growth compared to TMZ (30 mg/kg). Disease progression was evaluated by overall survival, clinical observations and body weight measurements. Our in vitro results show that VAL-083 is a potent inhibitor of all tested primary GBM cultures, irrespective of MGMT status. VAL-083 causes cell cycle arrest and loss of cell viability in TMZ-resistant cells, and at lower concentrations than TMZ in TMZ-sensitive cells. Furthermore, VAL-083 is not affected by cell culture condition (Stem vs. Non-Stem). Low dose VAL-083 combined with XRT exhibited an additive effect in all cultures tested, suggesting that VAL-083 might act as a radiosensitizer. In the in vivo U251 model, the median survival time for mice treated with 4 mg/kg VAL-083 was significantly increased to 72 days compared to 48 days for controls (p<0.0001). Median survival time for 3 mg/kg VAL-083 was 54 days. Body weight loss was observed in mice treated with 5 mg/kg and treatment was stopped after 4 doses after which the animals recovered and their median survival was 57 days. Animals treated with TMZ were terminated at day 102 at the end of the study. BT74: study is ongoing, data will be presented at the meeting.In conclusion, VAL-083 is highly efficacious against both stem and non-stem GBM cell cultures in vitro, the activity is independent of MGMT and VAL-083 appears to act as a radiosensitizer in GBM. In vivo xenograft GBM models further validate the benefits of VAL-083 in the treatment of GBM and support ongoing clinical research with VAL-083, which is currently in a clinical trial for GBM patients with recurrent disease. Citation Format: Shaun D. Fouse, Anne Steino, Nicholas Butowski, Jeffrey A. Bacha, Sarath Kanekal, Nancy Dos Santos, Dennis M. Brown, Joseph F. Costello. Dianhydrogalactitol inhibits the growth of glioma stem and non-stem cultures, including temozolomide-resistant cell lines, in vitro and in vivo. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2562. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2562

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→