Determination of Admittance Standards for Teacher Training Institutions: A Delphi Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the study is to determine admittance standard fields and performance indicators for teacher training institutions using the Delphi technique. The expert group of the study consisted of 34 experts fulfilling certain criteria. Delphi technique was utilized in determination of the standards. The technique was completed in three rounds. In the analysis of the data using the Delphi process, descriptive analysis, one of the content analysis methods was conducted during Delphi I. In Delphi II and III rounds, first quarter, median, third quarter and amplitude values were utilized. At the end of the study, the standards for admittance to teacher training institutions were determined within 8 standard areas and 56 performance indicators. Thus, 19 indicators in the field of personality traits, 7 in interest, 1 in health, 3 in field knowledge, 8 in intellectual level, 8 in attitude, 9 in skills and 10 performance indicators in technology standard were determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it