MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2561509358 · doi:10.1128/jcm.02052-16

Correction for Alhhazmi et al., Epidemiology of Invasive Group B Streptococcal Disease in Alberta, Canada, from 2003 to 2013

2016· erratum· en· W2561509358 on OpenAlexaffabout
Areej Alhhazmi, Donna Hurteau, Gregory J. Tyrrell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Microbiology · 2016
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and Maternal Infections
Canadian institutionsProvincial Laboratory of Public HealthUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParagraphEpidemiologyColumn (typography)MedicineMicrobiologyBiologyVeterinary medicineVirologyPathologyMathematicsComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Volume 54, no. 7, p. [1774–1781][1], 2016, . Page 1774, abstract, lines 10 and 11: “of which the majority were hvgA positive (86.6%)” should read “of which the majority were hvgA negative (93.4%).” Page 1776, column 2, “CPS IV strains” paragraph

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MicrobiologySame topicNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsFrench-language works237,207