MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2561545456 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2016.2632042

A Generalized Distance Transform: Theory and Applications to Weather Analysis and Forecasting

2016· article· en· W2561545456 on OpenAlexaff
Dominique Brunet, David Sills

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHausdorff distanceMetric (unit)Dilation (metric space)Distance transformMinkowski distanceMathematical morphologyAlgorithmMathematicsHausdorff spaceComputer scienceApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceGeometryImage processingEuclidean distanceDiscrete mathematicsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The distance transform (DT) (also known as distance map or distance field) is a fundamental tool of mathematical morphology. We introduce a generalized DT (GDT) that is smoother than the classical DT. This transform can be used to define a generalized Hausdorff metric that is shown to be more robust to noise while preserving all metric properties. It is also shown to lead to smoother level sets, allowing contour evolution without having to solve a partial differential equation. Two applications in weather analysis and forecasting demonstrate the usefulness of this proposed GDT. In particular, the dilation of sets according to the GDT allows the simplification of numerical weather forecasts and analysis into geometric objects, called MetObjects, and the generalized Hausdorff distance can be used as a forecast verification metric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207