Chitosan/sericin blend membranes for adsorption of bovine serum albumin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chitosan/sericin blend membranes for adsorption of bovine serum albumin (BSA) were investigated. A preliminary screening test was carried out to identify a suitable chitosan/sericin blend ratio. The blend membrane with a chitosan/sericin mass ratio of 4:1 was found to have a maximum adsorption capacity ( q m ) of 25.3 g/m 2 , which is 45 % greater than the maximum adsorption capacity of the pure chitosan membrane. The adsorption‐desorption cycle studies showed that the chitosan/sericin blend affinity membrane could be reused, and over 80 % of the original adsorption capacity was retained after regeneration. Compared to other affinity membranes for BSA adsorption, the chitosan/sericin membrane exhibited a significantly high adsorption capacity with a comparable adsorption rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".