MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W256170931

Ein ganzheitlicher Ansatz zur Digitalisierung und Extraktion von Metadaten in Videoarchiven

2013· article· de· W256170931 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marc Ritter, Robert Herms, Robert Manthey, Maximilian Eibl

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2013
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldComputer Science
TopicSemantic Web and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesGynecologyArtMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dem standigen Wachstum von Multimediaarchiven mit Automatisierung zu begegnen erfordert neue Ansatze und Losungen bei der Extraktion und Verwaltung von Metadaten. Dazu wurden die Frameworks AMOPA und Imtecs entwickelt, um Informationen uber den Inhalt der Multimediadaten und die technischen Randbedingungen ihres Einspielvorganges zu extrahieren und den nachfolgenden Stationen des Workflows zur automatischen Steuerung ihrer Arbeitsschritte zur Verfugung zu stellen. Im Archiv angewandt, ermoglichen sie sowohl umfangreichere und komplexere als auch spezifischere Suchen und Anfragen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.018
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicSemantic Web and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207