Self-Assembly of a Bile Acid Dimer in Aqueous Solutions: From Nanofibers to Nematic Hydrogels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A mixture of a cholic acid dimer with a secondary amine group and formic acid at a molar ratio of 1/1 is regarded as an organic salt, and it self-assembles in aqueous solutions to form monodisperse nanofibers. The nanofibers are separated at low concentrations of the mixture but entangle with each other at high concentrations to form well-dispersed and randomly arranged 3D fibrous networks. Above the minimum gelation concentration of the dimer, the fibrous network is strong enough to gelate the aqueous solutions to form a hydrogel. Hydrogels obtained from the dimer salt at a lower concentration are isotropic and show extinction between crossed polarizers in the polarizing microscope, whereas they become anisotropic (i.e., nematic hydrogels) upon increasing the dimer salt concentration or under physical stirring. The parallel arrangement of nanofibers from randomly directed fibrous networks may be responsible for the formation of such nematic hydrogels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".