Abstract A10: Exposure to heterocyclic aromatic amines, genetic susceptibility and bulky DNA adduct levels in blood leukocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: There is compelling evidence to suggest that aspects of diet influence cancer risk; specifically, high meat consumption is associated with elevated risks. Exposure to heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs), carcinogens produced in meat when cooked at high temperatures, is a hypothesized explanation for the meat-cancer relationship. Reactive HAA metabolites form adducts with DNA; left unrepaired, adducts can induce mutations which may initiate/promote carcinogenesis. Genetic differences in the ability to biotransform HAAs (as conferred by polymorphisms in CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, NAT1 and NAT2) and repair DNA adducts (as conferred by polymorphisms in XPA, XPD and XRCC1) is postulated to modify the dietary HAAs-DNA adduct relationship. Methods: In a cross-sectional study of 99 healthy volunteers recruited from Kingston, Ontario, Canada, dietary exposure to HAAs and bulky DNA adduct levels in blood leukocytes was investigated. A detailed questionnaire was used in combination with a mutagen database to estimate average intake of dietary HAAs. Specifically, the detailed questionnaire obtained the average frequency of consumption, usual level of doneness and usual serving size of nine commonly consumed meats items with high HAA content. Bulky DNA adduct levels were measured in blood collected after an overnight fast using 32P-postlabelling. Least squares regression was used to examine the relationship between dietary HAA exposure and bulky DNA adduct levels in blood. Gene-diet interactions between dietary HAAs and genetic factors relevant to the biotransformation of HAAs and DNA repair were also examined. Results: No main effects of dietary exposure to HAAs on bulky DNA adduct levels were observed. However, polymorphisms in NAT1 were found to associate with bulky DNA adduct levels. Specifically, those with the putative NAT1*10 rapid acetylator phenotype had a lower adduct level than those with the slow acetylator phenotype (p=0.02). Furthermore, having five or more ‘at-risk’ genotypes was associated with higher bulky DNA adduct levels (p=0.03). Gene-diet interactions were also observed between the NAT1*10 allele and dietary HAAs (p<0.05); specifically, among the slow acetylator phenotype, higher intakes of dietary HAAs were associated with an increase in DNA adduct levels compared to lower intakes. Conclusions: This study provides evidence of a biologic relationship between dietary HAAs, genetic susceptibility and bulky DNA adduct formation. The lack of a strong independent association between dietary HAAs and DNA adducts suggests that dietary HAAs are not a large contributor to bulky DNA adducts in this Canadian population; future studies should consider relevant gene-diet interactions to clarify the potential role of HAAs in carcinogenesis. Citation Format: Vikki Ho, Sarah Peacock, Thomas E. Massey, Roger W. L. Godschalk, Frederik-Jan van Schooten, Jian Chen, Will D. King. Exposure to heterocyclic aromatic amines, genetic susceptibility and bulky DNA adduct levels in blood leukocytes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2014 Sep 27-Oct 1; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2015;8(10 Suppl): Abstract nr A10.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".