MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2561826662 · doi:10.1109/nca.2016.7778607

A network service design and deployment process for NFV systems

2016· article· en· W2561826662 on OpenAlexaff
Sadaf Mustafiz, Francis Palma, Maria Toeroe, Ferhat Khendek

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)Concordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowComputer scienceProvisioningSoftware deploymentCloud computingService (business)Network serviceVirtualizationProcess (computing)Computer networkDistributed computingNetwork Functions VirtualizationSoftware engineeringOperating systemDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, the paradigm of Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) has emerged for the rapid provisioning and management of network services. It is based on the cloud paradigm and the virtualisation technology. The European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) has been actively defining the NFV framework, which includes several functional blocks for network service provisioning and management. The interfaces and the roles of these functional blocks are being defined as well as the artifacts they manipulate. However, the workflow defining the relations and dependencies between these different blocks as well as the successive processing of the artifacts throughout this workflow have not been specified. This is the purpose of this paper where we define an NFV standard compliant process for network service design and deployment. The process starts from the tenant network service requirements all the way to the network service deployment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207