« De la dualité primitive de l’homme (autopsie de l’hétérogène) » : méta-réflexivité, transfictionnalité et modalisation autonymique dans Le Cas Jekyll de Christine Montalbetti
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les romans de l’écrivaine française Christine Montalbetti font un usage étonnamment explicite de la modalisation autonymique, alors que l’énonciateur y revient constamment sur sa propre parole en pleine élaboration, témoignant ainsi d’une méta-réflexivité typique du roman de l’extrême contemporain. Cet article se consacre à l’analyse de l’ouvrage intitulé Le Cas Jekyll, texte dramatique de 2010 se voulant une version transfictionnelle du célèbre récit de Robert Louis Stevenson dans lequel l’énonciation montalbetienne fait de l’hétérogénéité constitutive du langage et du sujet l’objet même de la représentation. Ouvrage en apparence périphérique dans le corpus de Montalbetti, Le Cas Jekyll détiendrait peut-être néanmoins la clé de la poétique romanesque de cette dernière…
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".