MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Utility of Complement and ADAMTS13 Testing in Diagnosis of Thrombotic Microangiopathy: A Single Centre Retrospective Review

2014· article· en· W2561971436 on OpenAlexaffabout
Katerina Pavenski, Christoph Licht, Michael Kirschfink

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrombotic microangiopathyMedicineEculizumabADAMTS13Factor HPlasmapheresisInternal medicinePediatricsComplement systemImmunologyAntibodyVon Willebrand factorDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: A syndrome of TMA presenting with MAHA and thrombocytopenia can result from a variety of etiologies. Making an accurate diagnosis is important to guide treatment decisions and to inform prognosis. Our centre is one of the two adult apheresis units in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada with a catchment area of over 5 million people. Our centre maintains a database of all patients who were referred for investigation and treatment of TMA. We present our initial experience with complement testing (protein, function and genetics) in identifying patients with aHUS. Materials and Methods: Complement genetics studies included screening CFI, CFH, CFB, MCP/CD46, CFHR5, C3, APLN and THBD/CD141 genes and were performed at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Complement protein and function studies (CH50, AH50, C3d, sC5b-9, C3, factor H, factor I, and anti-factor H antibody) were performed in the laboratory of Michael Kirschfink, University of Heidelberg, Germany. ADAMTS13 testing was performed at St. Michael’s Hospital by a qualitative collagen binding assay before 2011 and after 2011 by ELISA (Technoclone GmbH, Vienna, Austria). Results: Between Jan 1 2010 and Dec 31 2013, 63 patients were referred with a presumed diagnosis of TTP for plasmapheresis. On presentation, all patients had evidence of MAHA and thrombocytopenia. Two additional patients had a history of TMA and were referred for a second opinion. One patient died before any diagnosis could be established and was excluded from further analysis. Based on diagnostic work-up, the 64 patients could be divided into 4 groups. Group 1: 32 patients were found to be ADAMTS13 deficient (ADAMTS13 activity less than 5%) and were diagnosed with TTP. One additional patient was diagnosed with TTP relapse even though her ADAMTS13 was more than 5% at the time of presentation. Group 2: 11 patients had clearly established alternative diagnoses: malignancy (4); STEC-HUS (3); scleroderma renal crisis (2); Clopidogrel induced TMA (1); hemaphagocytic syndrome (1). None of these patients underwent further testing. Group 3: In 10 patients, TMA was associated with (and perhaps caused by) other factors including postpartum state (2), splenectomy (1), EtOH binge (1), sepsis, post alloBMT (1), dyskeratosis congenita, post alloBMT (1), autoimmune disease (4). Six out of ten had evidence of acute kidney injury and underwent complement genetics testing. No disease causing mutations were identified in 5 patients and a possible disease causing mutation was identified in CFH gene in one patient. Five patients were eventually given a diagnosis of aHUS. Only 3 of these patients had complement protein studies done and the results were as follows: no abnormalities (1), elevated sC5b-9 (2), low C3 (2), low factor I (1). Group 4: 11 patients were diagnosed with aHUS. They all presented with TMA and acute kidney injury and no precipitant or alternative diagnosis could be identified. Out of these 11 patients, 9 patients had complement genetics done and the results were as follows: no disease causing mutation identified (6), mutation in CFHR5 (2), mutation in CFI (1). 5 patients had complement protein studies done. Notable findings included no abnormalities in any of the parameters (2), anti-H antibody (1), elevated sC5b-9 (2), low C3 (1), and elevated AH50 (3). Conclusion: From all patients referred to our apheresis unit with TMA, 50% were eventually diagnosed with TTP and 25% with aHUS. Careful work-up is warranted to assist with therapeutic decisions, however, at present no one test can accurately identify patients with aHUS. Utilizing the current genetic screen, only 25% (4/16) of patients clinically diagnosed with aHUS had genetic abnormalities detected. Half of patients diagnosed with aHUS underwent complement antigen and function testing and the most common results were elevated sC5b-9 (4), elevated AH50 (3), low C3 (3) and no abnormalities (3). The study is ongoing. Disclosures Pavenski: Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Licht:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207