Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les ossements animaux occupent des fonctions pratiques et rituelles extrêmement variées et complexes au sein des cultures ancestrales atikamekw et innue, que ce soit sur le plan spirituel, alimentaire, artistique ou autre. Encore aujourd’hui, en plus d’évoquer le trépas, les ossements font référence aux pratiques de communication avec les esprits animaux – comme la scapulomancie – et à la vision holistique du monde chez les peuples algonquiens. En intégrant des peaux et des fragments de squelettes animaux à leurs oeuvres portant sur des réalités contemporaines de pertes et de négociations intimes et collectives d’ordre culturel et territorial, les artistes Sonia Robertson et Eruoma Awashish parviennent à réactualiser le pouvoir de guérison et de résurgence traditionnellement associé aux ossements. Ainsi, la mise en scène d’os permet à ces créatrices de réécrire l’histoire de lieux chargés de sens et de réaffirmer l’importance actuelle de notions spirituelles, identitaires et culturelles autochtones ancestrales dans un contexte de réaffirmation collective et individuelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".