MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2562056480

PAWSing Student Stress: A Pilot Evaluation Study of the St. John Ambulance Therapy Dog Program on Three University Campuses in Canada/Museler le Stress Chez L'étudiant : ÉTude Pilote D'évaluation Menée Sur Trois Campus Universitaires Au Canada Dans le Cadre Du Programme De Zoothérapie Canine d'Ambulance Saint-Jean

2015· article· fr· W2562056480 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Colleen Anne Dell, Darlene Chalmers, James Gillett, Betty Rohr, Chelsea Nickel, Lori Campbell, Rita Hanoski, Josh Haugerud, Alicia Husband, Coby Stephenson, Madison Brydges

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingMental healthPsychological interventionPsychologyMedicineMedical educationGerontologyPsychiatrySocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Animals are firmly embedded in many family units and are often included in how families define themselves (Tedeschi, Fitchett, & Molidor, 2005; Vanier Institute, 2009). More than one half of North American households have an animal living in them (McNicholas & Collis, 2006; Perrin, 2009; Stats, Pierfelice, Kim, & Crandell, 1999), with nearly half of those animals being dogs (Humane Society of the United States, 2014). Young adults who move away from the family home to attend university often leave behind important supports in their lives, including companion animals. With student mental health growing concern on Canadian university campuses in recent years, therapy dogs were first formally introduced in 2012 at the University of Ottawa. This article begins by situating the mental health needs of students on Canadian campuses and the growth of animal-assisted interventions as one response. The goals of the St. John Ambulance (SJA) Therapy Dog program-to offer love and support-are then established. Next, the immediate and three-month follow-up outcomes of pilot evaluation study of the program at three Canadian universities (University of Saskatchewan, University of Regina, and McMaster University) are reviewed during final examination period. It was found that the therapy dogs unequivocally offer love and support to students. Love was understood as having reciprocal love for the dogs and gaining positive feelings from visiting with them. Support was understood by students as destressing and relaxing from interacting with the dogs and to much lesser extent with the handlers. These findings, coupled with recent literature, also raise concern about female students identifying greater level of in their lives than males. This article makes an important contribution to the flourishing practice of, but dearth of empirical understanding about, animal-assisted activities on university campuses. Implications for mental health supports for university students are suggested.Animal-Assisted InterventionsAnimal-assisted interventions (AAIs) is the umbrella term for any intervention that includes or incorporates animals as part of therapeutic process (Fine & Beck, 2010). Canine-specific AAIs include animal-assisted therapy (AAT), where, for example, dog is part of therapeutic counselling session. AAIs also include animal-assisted activities (AAAs), which are the focus of this article. Animal-assisted activities provide opportunities for motivational, educational, recreational, and/or therapeutic benefits to enhance quality of life (Kruger & Serpell, 2006, p. 23). Specially trained professionals, paraprofessionals, and volunteers visit in variety of contexts with animals that meet specific criteria (Pet Partners, n.d.). An AAA is typically informal, takes places in variety of environments, and is not targeted at any specific medical condition or person (Huss, 2012, p. 444). While AAAs are explicitly not therapy (i.e., treatment goals are not identified), they can be therapeutic. The human-animal bond was introduced as concept in psychiatry, psychology, and sociology as early as the 1940s (Young, 2012). Today, the American Veterinary Medical Association recognizes that[t]he human-animal bond is mutually beneficial and dynamic relationship between people and animals that is influenced by behaviors that are essential to the health and well-being of both. This includes, but is not limited to, emotional, psychological, and physical interactions of people, animals, and the environment. (American Veterinary Medical Association, n.d.)Young (2012) describes the mental and physiological experience of AAT and AAAs as a tactile process whereby unconditional attachment bonds form between animals and humans, inducing relaxation by reducing cardiovascular reactivity to stress (p. 218). Yet there is ongoing skepticism toward AAIs because of historic absence of empirical research measuring outcomes (Borrego et al. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Counselling and PsychotherapySame topicHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207