MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2562068785 · doi:10.1515/gmj-2016-0065

Piecewise synergetic systems and applications in biochemical systems theory

2016· article· en· W2562068785 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeorgian Mathematical Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNorges ForskningsrådUniversidad Complutense de Madrid
KeywordsPiecewiseConvergence (economics)MathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationSequence (biology)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We study piecewise synergetic systems originating from Biochemical Systems Theory. In the first part of the paper, the emphasis is put on practical calculations with such systems. We consider four examples: calculation of trajectories and steady states, solution of an optimization problem and a method of estimation of parameters (kinetic orders), all examples being biologically motivated. In the second part of the paper, we study convergence of solutions, in particularly, steady states, of a sequence of piecewise synergetic systems approximating an arbitrary compartment model. This convergence analysis is then applied to the optimization problem and the method of estimating sensitivities (kinetic orders) in a generic compartment model. In this paper we put forward arguments for the importance of the theoretical and numerical analysis of piecewise synergetic systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it