Adaptive Parametric Tuning of Glucose-Insulin Kinetics Models Using Multilayer Perceptrons
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modeling of human glucose-insulin kinetics is a complex non-linear multivariate problem. Models are required to represent the dynamics of the human glucose-insulin system and account for multiple edge cases with clinically accepted levels of accuracy. State of the art systems typically incorporate data from clinical trials of large cohorts in order to produce model parameters. Their ability to produce highly accurate results on a per-cohort basis have encouraged researchers to explore the possibility of extending their utility to individual patients. Among these research efforts, machine learning techniques such as support vector machines have been employed with varying levels of success. This paper proposes a novel adaptive method of generating patient-specific model parameters using multilayer perceptrons. A clinically accepted physiological model of glucose-insulin kinetics is used to generate features that are passed to a multilayer perceptron. Comparison of the predicted versus actual parameters of the model indicate that the MLP method is highly accurate and can be utilized to calibrate physiological models to specific patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it