MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2562250704

Exploring the relationship between individual cultural values and employee silence

2016· dissertation· en· W2562250704 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sumeth Tanyaovalaksna

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilenceCultural valuesPsychologySocial psychologySociologySocial scienceAestheticsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the relationship between individual cultural values and employee silence among nurses, medical laboratory technologists, and primary care paramedics in Canada. The study has four parts: Part A looks at the relationship between power distance, uncertainty avoidance, quiescent silence, and acquiescent silence. It also investigates the mediating role of psychological safety, using the Sobel formula and bootstrapping techniques. Part B investigates the relationship among collectivism, long-term orientation, competition, prosocial silence, and opportunistic silence. Part C investigates how the three professions use their silence in the workplace and Part D examines their perceptions relating to power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and competition. \nThe study comprised 378 healthcare professionals including 156 registered nurses, 115 medical laboratory technologists, and 107 primary care paramedics. Part A results indicate that, for the professions combined, uncertainty avoidance and power distance have positive relationships with acquiescent silence but not with quiescent silence. These results are not replicable for the professions separately, indicating there are differences in cultural values among nurses, medical laboratory technologists and primary care paramedics. \n\tAcross the professions, psychological safety has mediating roles between uncertainty avoidance, and both acquiescent and quiescent silence. However, psychological safety has no mediating role between power distance and acquiescent or quiescent silence. For the professions separately, these results are not replicable.\n\tThe relationships among collectivism, competition and long-term orientation, prosocial silence and opportunistic silence are also investigated in Part B. Collectively, the three professions show significant relationships between competition and opportunistic silence, competition and prosocial silence, and collectivism and prosocial silence. These patterns are not replicable when each profession is examined separately. \n\tIn Part C, both MANOVA and latent variable means indicate significant differences in the mean cultural values among the three professions. However, latent variable means and the post hoc tests disagree on the sub-construct differences between nurses and primary care paramedics, and between medical laboratory technologists and primary care paramedics. This implies that each individual construct will not be a good predictor for all three professions.\nBoth MANOVA and latent variable means suggest significant differences in perceptions of individual cultural values among nurses, primary care paramedics, and medical laboratory technologists in Part D. Here also, latent variable means and the post hoc tests disagree on the differences of the sub-constructs between nurses and medical laboratory technologists, and between nurses and primary care paramedics.\nThis study has implications for healthcare administrators who will need to develop communication and reporting policies that fit these three professions, especially the medical laboratory technologists. This group exhibits a positive relationship between power distance and acquiescent silence. These employees might most benefit from a workplace that is conducive to speaking up and a leader who seriously listens and legitimizes their concerns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorFrench-language works237,207