MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2562299524 · doi:10.3842/sigma.2016.118

On Asymptotic Regimes of Orthogonal Polynomials with Complex Varying Quartic Exponential Weight

2016· article· en· W2562299524 on OpenAlexafffund
Marco Bertola, Alexander Tovbis

Bibliographic record

VenueSymmetry Integrability and Geometry Methods and Applications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQuartic functionOrthogonal polynomialsMathematicsExponential functionPhase portraitCombinatoricsMonic polynomialExponential polynomialPure mathematicsExponential growthMathematical physicsMathematical analysisPhysicsPolynomialQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the asymptotics of recurrence coefficients for monic orthogonal polynomials π n (z) with the quartic exponential weight exp[-N ( 1 2 z 2 + 1 4 tz 4 )], where t ∈ C and N ∈ N, N → ∞.Our goal is to describe these asymptotic behaviors globally for t ∈ C in different regions.We also describe the "breaking" curves separating these regions, and discuss their special (critical) points.All these pieces of information combined provide the global asymptotic "phase portrait" of the recurrence coefficients of π n (z), which was studied numerically in [Constr.Approx.41 (2015), 529-587, arXiv:1108.0321].The main goal of the present paper is to provide a rigorous framework for the global asymptotic portrait through the nonlinear steepest descent analysis (with the g-function mechanism) of the corresponding Riemann-Hilbert problem (RHP) and the continuation in the parameter space principle.The latter allows to extend the nonlinear steepest descent analysis from some parts of the complex t-plane to all noncritical values of t.We also provide explicit solutions for recurrence coefficients in terms of the Riemann theta functions.The leading order behaviour of the recurrence coefficients in the full scaling neighbourhoods the critical points (double and triple scaling limits) was obtained in [Constr.Approx.41 (2015), 529-587, arXiv:1108.0321] and [Asymptotics of complex orthogonal polynomials on the cross with varying quartic weight: critical point behaviour and the second Painlevé transcendents, in preparation].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymmetry Integrability and Geometry Methods and ApplicationsSame topicMathematical functions and polynomialsFrench-language works237,207