MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2562469105 · doi:10.5038/1911-9933.10.3.1456

Case Note: Case of Vasiliauskas v. Lithuania in the European Court of Human Rights

2016· article· en· W2562469105 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stoyan Panov

Bibliographic record

VenueGenocide Studies and Prevention · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman rightsGenocidePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithuania was incorporated in the USSR under the name "the Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic" in 1944. In 1949, an all-partisan organization fighting for the independence of Lithuania was formed. From mid-September 1951, Mr. Vasiliauskas had been working as an operation agent of the MGB, the precursor of the KGB, on the territory of the Lithuanian SSR. On January 2, 1953, Mr. Vasiliauskas took part in an operation against two Lithuanian partisans of the Movement of the Struggle for the Freedom of Lithuania, the brothers J.A. and A.A, who were shot and killed in the akiai area in Lithuania. After the January 2, 1953 operation, Mr. Vasiliauskas was promoted to a senior operational agent and was awarded and decorated at least 24 times in his 25-year service in the KGB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenocide Studies and PreventionSame topicEuropean and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207