Abstract 4609: Risk loci in telomere structure and maintenance genes across five cancer types: GAME-ON Consortium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Telomeres are complex structures that cap chromosome ends, protecting them from degradation, double strand breaks and end-to-end fusions. Telomeres are maintained by the enzyme telomerase, which is made up of a reverse transcriptase encoded by TERT, and an RNA template encoded by TERC. The telomere structure itself is composed of proteins encoded by ACD, ACYP2, BICD1, DKC1, DCLRE1B, MPHOSPH6, NAF1, NOLA1, NOLA2, NOLA3, OBFC1, PIK3C3, POT1, RTEL1, TEP1, TERF1, TERF2, TERF21P, TINF2, TNKS/PINX1, TPP1 and ZNF208. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TERT and adjoining CLPTM1L gene region are associated with multiple cancer types, and some are associated with both increased and decreased risks across different cancer types. We systematically characterized the patterns of association between variants in these 25 telomere structure and maintenance genes and risk across five cancer types in the Genetic Association and Mechanisms in Oncology (GAME-ON) consortium. We performed a subset-based meta-analysis (ASSET) of 209,367 directly measured and imputed SNPs, one megabase up- and downstream of these genes, across genome-wide association studies of colorectal (5,100 cases, 4,831 controls), lung (12,160 cases, 16,838 controls), breast (15,748 cases, 18,084 controls), ovarian (4,369 cases, 9,123 controls) and prostate (14,160 cases, 12,724 controls) cancers. Correlations (r2) between SNPs were examined in Haploview using the 1000 Genomes Project CEU population. A total of 87 TERT, 123 TERC and 26 DCLRE1B SNPs were associated with cancer risk at gene-level Bonferroni-corrected p-values of 4.2-7.8×10−6. Patterns of association were similar for prostate and colorectal cancers in DCLRE1B. Much stronger associations were observed in TERT and TERC, with 63 and 24 SNPs reaching genome-wide significance (p<5.0×10−8), respectively. Of these, 9 TERT and 9 TERC SNPs were correlated at r2<0.75. The most strongly associated SNPs in TERT (rs37004, p = 2.6×10−11) and TERC (rs76925190, p = 1.5×10−15) are in regions containing documented risk loci for lung and prostate cancers, respectively. TERT rs37004 (p = 1.2×10−13) and 6 of the other 9 SNPs in TERT were associated only with lung cancer risk. For the other 2 SNPs, there was a suggestion that patterns of risk were opposite for lung and prostate cancers. While TERC rs76925190 was strongly associated with prostate cancer risk (p = 5.4 x10−17), it was also suggestively associated with colorectal cancer risk (p<0.005). This pattern was similar for another 2 of the 9 SNPs, while for the rest, associations were limited to prostate cancer. The complex patterns of association in telomere structure and maintenance genes observed across cancer types may provide insight about the mechanisms through which telomere dysfunction in different tissues influences cancer risk. Citation Format: Sara Karami, Younghun Han, Fredrick R. Schumacher, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Sara Lindstrom, John S. Witte, Iona Cheng, Shenying Fang, Jiali Han, Peter Kraft, Fengju Song, Rayjean J. Hung, James McKay, Stephen J. Chanock, Mala Pande, Angela Risch, Hongbing Shen, Christopher A. Haiman, Lisa Boardman, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Graham Casey, Ulrike Peters, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Brandon Pierce, Wei Zheng, Christopher I. Amos, Jennifer A. Doherty. Risk loci in telomere structure and maintenance genes across five cancer types: GAME-ON Consortium. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4609. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4609
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".