MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Osteoclastic Network Determines In Vitro Niche for Mouse and Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells

2011· article· en· W2562524122 on OpenAlexaff
Éric Deneault, Brian T. Wilhelm, Frédéric Barabé, Guy Sauvageau

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaematopoiesisCell biologyBiologyStem cellIn vitroRetrovirusTransfectionTranscription factorCell cultureGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1325 New innovative strategies are needed to expand human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for clinical applications. In this perspective, we recently developed an in vitro/in vivo screening strategy, which revealed 18 nuclear factors that enhance HSC activity (Deneault et al., Cell 2009). During these experiments, mouse HSCs were kept for 12 days in mini-cultures that included viral producer cells for each tested factor. Interestingly, 4 of the 18 hits identified in this initial screen, i.e., Fos, Tcfec, Hmgb1 and Sfpi1 operated through non-HSC autonomous (NHA) mechanisms: expanded HSCs were not infected with retrovirus. This suggested that the transfected viral producer cells (feeder cells) produced membrane-bound or soluble molecules that promote expansion of HSCs introduced in these cultures. We now provide evidence that seven additional factors, i.e., Smarcc1, Vps72, Sox4, Klf10, Ski, Prdm16 and Erdr1 significantly enhance HSC activity through NHA mechanisms, hereafter called “NHA factors”. Moreover, we found that Vps72, Fos and Klf10 also promote expansion of human HSCs by NHA mechanisms. Interestingly at least for feeders expressing Klf10, we observed that physical contact between HSCs and these engineered support cells was not necessary, suggesting the presence of secreted molecule(s) in the medium. Expression profiling was next performed using mRNA extracted from feeder cells transduced with each of the NHA factors. Firstly, we shed light on the transcriptional make up and potential convergence of signaling pathways in the engineered feeder cells: our results reveal two independent but interconnected transcriptional regulatory subnetworks. Strikingly, some constituents of the subnetworks, i.e., Sfpi1, Fos, Klf10 and Tcfec (Mitf-related) have previously been shown to play critical roles in the regulation of osteoclasts, which are a myeloid-derived population of cells residing in the HSC bone marrow niche. In addition, all of the NHA factors act in concert to increase Prdm16 expression levels in a range from 2.5- to 54.6-fold. For this reason, Prdm16 clearly holds the position of central hub of the osteoclastic network. However, Tcfec represents the ultimate downstream effector of this pathway as Prdm16 elevates its expression levels by 18.9-fold. In parallel, Prdm16 can also increase the expression of Sfpi1, which in turn can upregulate Tcfec expression up to 874-fold. Moreover, upregulated mRNA targets corresponding to factors that are secreted or associated with the plasma membrane were considered as potential candidate agonists of HSC self-renewal. A high degree of overlap was observed between the sets of proteins produced by feeder cells engineered to overexpress Sfpi1, Fos, Klf10, Tcfec or Ski. These secreted and membrane bound proteins include Agt, Aspn, Ogn, Ptgds, Nckap1l, Rgs16 and Lcn2. Studies are ongoing to characterize the contribution of these newly identified NHA proteins in HSC expansion. Validation of these NHA proteins in human HSC expansion will have a clear potential for translational medicine. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207