MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2562538765 · doi:10.7202/1046994ar

LES JEUNES ET WIKIPÉDIA : UN RAPPORT GENRÉ ?

2018· article· fr· W2562538765 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gilles Sahut

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de recherches en littératie médiatique multimodale · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWikis in Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les jeunes ont fréquemment recours à Wikipédia , mais la confiance qu’ils accordent à cette encyclopédie collaborative n’est pas optimale et sa réputation demeure controversée. Les filles/femmes font-elles preuve d’une plus grande défiance vis-à-vis de cette source si particulière ? D’après le modèle de sélectivité, elles seraient plus sensibles aux risques informationnels et plus prudentes dans leur démarche évaluative. L’enquête par questionnaire menée auprès de 841 jeunes âgés de 11 à 25 ans montre l’existence de différences genrées à propos de la confiance épistémique en Wikipédia , de la sensibilité à sa réputation et des connaissances informationnelles à son sujet. Néanmoins, la prise en compte du niveau de scolarité amène à nuancer l’influence du genre sur le rapport à cette source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de recherches en littératie médiatique multimodaleSame topicWikis in Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207