MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2562579240 · doi:10.1039/c6cp08313g

Simultaneous NMR characterisation of multiple minima in the free energy landscape of an RNA UUCG tetraloop

2016· article· en· W2562579240 on OpenAlexaff
Aditi N. Borkar, Pramodh Vallurupalli, Carlo Camilloni, Lewis E. Kay, Michele Vendruscolo

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto Public Health
FundersWellcome Trust
KeywordsEnergy landscapeMetadynamicsRNAReplicaChemical physicsMolecular dynamicsChemistryMaxima and minimaConformational ensemblesStructural motifNucleic acid structurePhysicsStatistical physicsComputational chemistryMathematicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RNA molecules in solution tend to undergo structural fluctuations of relatively large amplitude and to populate a range of different conformations some of which with low populations. It is still very challenging, however, to characterise the structures of these low populated states and to understand their functional roles. In the present study, we address this problem by using NMR residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) as structural restraints in replica-averaged metadynamics (RAM) simulations. By applying this approach to a 14-mer RNA hairpin containing the prototypical UUCG tetraloop motif, we show that it is possible to construct the free energy landscape of this RNA molecule. This free energy landscapes reveals the surprisingly rich dynamics of the UUCG tetraloop and identifies the multiple substates that exist in equilibrium owing to thermal fluctuations. The approach that we present is general and can be applied to the study of the free energy landscapes of other RNA or RNA-protein systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207