MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2562715531 · doi:10.4000/ifha.6514

Schmutzer, Kurt, Der Liebe zur Naturgeschichte halber. Johann Natterers Reisen in Brasilien 1817-1836

2013· article· de· W2562715531 on OpenAlexaff
Gaëlle Hallair

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2013
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Natural History
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Issu d’un travail de doctorat ancré dans la Völkerkunde et l’histoire des sciences, cet ouvrage, édité par l’Académie des sciences autrichiennes, est centré sur la figure scientifique méconnue de Johann Natterer (1787-1843), qui fut l’un des premiers Européens à explorer le Brésil. Pendant 18 ans, de 1817 à 1836, celui qui ne fut ni un nouvel Humboldt ni un universitaire, enrichit sans relâche ses collections zoologiques, botaniques, minéralogiques et ethnographiques pour le compte du cabinet...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.463
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicHistory of Science and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207