Developing a Teacher Administered Anxiety Rating Scale Suitable for Five to Seven-Year-Old Children
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents results of twin studies pertinent to the development of a rating scale designed for use by teachers to identify anxious and shy children, aged 5 to 7 years, in Kindergarten and Grade One. Currently, no instruments designed specifically for this purpose exist. Children experiencing difficulty with internalizing disorders such as anxiety, shyness, and behavioural inhibition represent a growing segment of the population (Merrell,2001). Evidence indicates the educational, psychological, and emotional needs of these children are not being addressed (Barlow,2002). Kindergarten and Grade One teachers were interviewed to find out if they recognized behaviours drawn from the literature on childhood anxiety disorders as shyness and anxiety. Information obtained was used to formulate, construct, and evaluate a rating scale to be administered by teachers. The paper includes an overview, literature review of the research on anxiety in young children, description of methods used to obtain salient information and a discussion regarding construction of the rating scale. Data for the two studies was obtained by both quantitative and qualitative methods. The first study employed semi-structured interviews with teachers and their completion of a prototype rating scale. The second study consisted of the administration of the scale and comparisons of its psychometric properties to other instruments. The paper concludes with a discussion of the results and limitations of the studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it