Os Cadernos de Sociomuseologia 1993-2012: um balanço de 19 anos de atividade
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article aims to analyze globally the work between 1993 and 2012 by the Journal of Sociomuseology (44 volumes published), who was born to serve the education and the critical reflection that was proposed by the Post-Graduation program in Sociomuseology. During these 19 years the jornal have always been at the center of their activity the publication of texts that somehow could contribute to the reflection and consolidation of museology as social science but having the Sociomuseology as a guide. This option results in the truth of the social and cultural context in which they were born the first training programs which were designed to accommodate each and every person who already working in museums, had by reference to ecomuseology and / or new museology and of course concerns related to participation, identity, dialogic processes of acting, which in one way or another if they could relate to the content of the Declaration of Santiago Round Table 1972 and 1984 Quebec Declaration. Keyword: Sociomuseology: Journal of Sociomuseology
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.021 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".