Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a product oriented thesis that aims to create a social media marketing strategy for a Canadian event planning and design firm Art of Celebrations. The goal was to create an ac-tion plan in order to further differentiate the commissioning company from others alike in the highly competitive event and wedding planning industry in Toronto.\nThe theoretical framework of this thesis covers marketing, social media marketing, the brand image and the main social media channels for the commissioning party: Instagram, Pinterest and Facebook. The author decided on Quantitative Research Method in order to gain understanding of the niche group’s behaviour on social media. The research was conducted to Finnish brides’ and the answers validated with a questionnaire to Canadians about their social media behaviour. The findings from the two researches supported each other.\nSocial Media Marketing Strategy was made based on the theory and the research and the strategy is delivered in a handbook form. It has been customized to fit the needs of the com-missioning company.\nThe project began March 2016 and was finalized in November of the same year.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it