URBAN REGENERATION AND THE ROLE OF CULTURE: AN INTRODUCTION TO CULTURAL QUARTER
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Konsep creative city merupakan salah satu cara untuk memenangkan kompetisi antar kota pada era globalisasi ini. Adalah penting bagi kota untuk mengubah imagenya menjadi sesuatu yang baru atau lebih baik, karena proses tersebut akan mendorong terjadinya peningkatan investasi bagi sebuah daerah atau kota itu sendiri. Perencanaan perkotaan membutuhkan strategi yang tepat untuk melakukan proses regenerasi kawasan perkotaan tersebut, salah satunya cultural quarter yang mengubah suatu kawasan yang tidak memiliki nilai ekonomis menjadi suatu daerah baru yang kaya akan potensi kultural dan ekonomis melalui proses komodifikasi. Beberapa hal yang harus diperhatikan di dalam pengembangan kawasan cultural quarter ini diantaranya adalah faktor faktor pendukung termasuk area yang membutuhkan proses regenerasi (seperti daerah peninggalan historis atau peninggalan industri), cultural infrastructure, proses perencanaan yang tepat, networking, katalisator, dan morfologi. The art of townscape is the conscious arrangement of physical things for man’s convenience, safety and pleasure (Charles Elio).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".