MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563014751 · doi:10.1299/jtst.2016jtst0036

Development of a numerical model for Marangoni convection in the micro-scale environment

2016· article· en· W2563014751 on OpenAlexaff
Takuya Yamamoto, Yasunori Okano, S. Dost

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thermal Science and Technology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsMarangoni effectComputational fluid dynamicsConvectionSurface tensionMolecular dynamicsMechanicsComputer simulationScale (ratio)Statistical physicsComputer sciencePhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marangoni convection is induced in liquids by surface tension gradient along a free surface.Such flows also develop in nano-and micro-scale systems and play important roles.To have a better understanding for the phenomena occurring in processing of such micro-scale systems, generally two kinds of numerical simulation approaches have been considered: continuum and discrete (molecular dynamics).While the continuum-based techniques cannot capture the intermolecular effects, the molecular dynamics approach requires huge computational cost.To address the adverse futures of these techniques, a new numerical method has been developed by combining the computational f luid dynamics (CFD) from the continuum side and Langevin dynamics from the discrete approach.The present simulation results have shown that this new numerical technique can successfully study and predict the phenomena occurring in macro-scale process applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thermal Science and TechnologySame topicFluid Dynamics and Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207