Geographic Routing in Duty-Cycled Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks With Radio Irregularity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Industrial wireless sensor networks (IWSNs) are required to provide highly reliable and real-time transmission. Moreover, for connected K-neighborhood (CKN) sleep scheduling-based duty-cycled IWSNs in which the network lifetime of IWSNs can be prolonged, the two-phase geographic greedy forwarding (TPGF) geographic routing algorithm has attracted attention due to its unique transmission features: multi path, shortest path, and hole bypassing. However, the performance of TPGF in CKN-based duty-cycled IWSNs with radio irregularity is not well investigated in the literature. In this paper, we first evaluate the impact of radio irregularity on CKN-based duty-cycled IWSNs. Furthermore, we investigate the routing performance of TPGF in CKN-based duty-cycled IWSNs with radio irregularity, in terms of the number of explored routing paths as well as the lengths of the average and shortest routing paths. Particularly, we establish the upper bound on the number of explored routing paths. The upper bound is slightly relaxed with radio irregularity compared with without radio irregularity; however, it is bounded by the number of average 1-hop neighbors in always-on IWSNs. With extensive simulations, we observe that the cross-layer optimized version of TPGF (i.e., TPFGPlus) finds reliable transmission paths with low end-to-end delay, even in CKN-based duty-cycled IWSNs with radio irregularity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".