MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563104019 · doi:10.4000/cel.321

Censure, éthique et propagande au sein de la revue URSS en construction

2015· article· fr· W2563104019 on OpenAlexaff
Jessica Watson

Bibliographic record

VenueLes cahiers de l École du Louvre · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La revue photographique URSS en construction est produite de 1929 à 1949 à des fins de propagande dans le but de montrer aux pays occidentaux la puissance industrielle et idéologique de l’URSS. Certains artistes éminents tels que El Lissitzky et Alexandre Rodchenko y contribuent et véhiculent à travers leurs photomontages, une image utopique de la société stalinienne des années 1930. Entre censure et propagande, comment comprendre leurs œuvres aujourd’hui et comment situer la place de l’artiste dans un régime totalitaire ? La revue URSS en construction met en lumière les complexités idéologiques au cœur de l’art soviétique et pose la question du dilemme entre intégrité artistique et survie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.038
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes cahiers de l École du LouvreSame topicHistorical and Political StudiesFrench-language works237,207