MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2563150819 · doi:10.4095/211137

Stratigraphy and structures within the Lower to Middle Jurassic Hazelton Group, Takysie Lake and Marilla map areas, central British Columbia

2000· report· en· W2563150819 on OpenAlexaffabout
C D Pint, R G Anderson, J. Brian Mahoney

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStratigraphyGeologyGroup (periodic table)PaleontologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deformed Hazelton Group rocks in southern Takysie Lake (NTS 93 F/13) and northern Marilla (NTS 93 F/12) map areas consist of maroon to reddish-brown polymictic cobble conglomerate; red, pebbly mudstone; and feldspathic lithic wacke. The strata form the upper plate of a northwest-trending, southwest-dipping reverse fault. The rocks commonly dip moderately to the north, are locally folded about a northwest-trending fold axis, and are penetratively deformed. A closely spaced S1 cleavage dipping moderately southeast and a less well developed S2 cleavage dipping steeply west represent the oldest recognized structures in the region. The lower plate consists of Jurassic Bowser Lake or Cretaceous Skeena groups chert-rich greywacke and polymictic chert- and felsic volcanic-rich conglomerate exhibiting an east-trending, moderately dipping cleavage. Hanging wall and footwall rocks are intruded by the undeformed (?)Late Cretaceous Skins Lake pluton, constraining the timing of deformation to post-Jurassic and pre-(?)Late Cretaceous.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→