MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563243935

Protecting Information: Active Cyber Defence for the Business Entity: A Prerequisite Corporate Policy

2016· article· en· W2563243935 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrick Neal, Joe Ilsever

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of strategic management journal/Academy of Strategic Management journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation and Cyber Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity theftHarmCorporationConfidentialityBusinessLawLaw and economicsInternet privacyEconomicsPolitical scienceFinanceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTIONWe now live in a period of time where the flow of and protecting that involves corporations and governments (Castell, 2009; Hood & Galas, 2003; Keyl, 2002). This period of time has been characterized as the (Floridi, 2002). The essence of the Information Age is captured succinctly by Bruce, Hick, and Cooper (2004) in their opening comments about the role of in contemporary and its impact within the corporate environment.Information is the most valuable commodity in the world. It 's more valuable than money, with it one can make money. It's more valuable than power, with it one can achieve power. It's more valuable than goods, with it one can build, acquire, and improve goods. In any business, in any industry, in any part of the world, the right is absolutely priceless. (Bruce, Hick, & Cooper, 2004, p. 11)Webster (2006) proposed that the information society is subject to abuse, threats, and could be used to cause harm to the individuals who surrendered their personal to the corporation. This harm has been variously estimated to cost each identity theft victim approximately $1,600 (USD) (Baum, 2007) to recover from identity theft. For corporations the cost of cybercrime is expensive.According to Ponemon Institute (2012) investigations, incident recovery, and victim payments doubled between 2010 - 2012 (Table 1), and expect to increase the foreseeable future.IBM's 2015 study of the corporate data breach costs for each lost or stolen record containing sensitive and confidential increased 6 percent, jumping from $145 in 2014 to $154 in 2015. The lowest cost per lost or stolen record is in the transportation industry, at $121, and the public sector, at $68. The retail industry's average cost increased exponentially, from $105 last year to $165.In response to these concerns a growing industry, corporations, science and computer science researchers have developed a number of tactical and strategic responses such as firewalls, encryption, and software tools (Hopkins, 2011; Lachow, 2013; Public Safety Canada, 2011) to protect assets. Despite the level of success, these tactical and strategic responses have caused frustration. The cyber criminals continue to steal information, damage corporate assets, seemingly, without any consequence (Public Safety Canada, 2011). This has caused the corporations to seriously assess the relevancy and effectiveness of their cyber protection policies and possible activation of corporate cyber-defensive strategies against cyber criminals.One possible alternative to current practices is to develop and utilize an active cyber defence (ACD) strategy. ACD is a series of technological and socially engineered tactics which focus on deterring the cybercriminal. ACD relies on hacker techniques such as hack backs, denial of services attack, malware deployment, and ransomware. In other words corporations and governments would use the same technologies a cybercriminal uses when attacking.Dogrul, Aslan, and Celik (2011) defined cyber deterrence as the proactive measures that are taken to counter cyber-terrorism activities. The mission of cyber deterrence is to prevent enemies from conducting future attacks by changing their minds, by attacking their technology, or by more palpable means such as confiscation, termination, incarceration, casualty, or destruction (p. 39). However, the current legal environment clearly prevents corporations from engaging in ACD.This paper explored the following questions:1. Are corporations and governments willing and able to conduct active cyber defence operations?2. If active cyber defence were legalized would corporate decision makers conduct ACD?PROTECTING THE INFORMATION SOCIETYCastell's (2010) study of networked societies and Hopkins (2011) study of protecting the revealed that it was necessary to understand how constructs cybersecurity as a social phenomenon. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.006
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of strategic management journal/Academy of Strategic Management journalSame topicInformation and Cyber SecurityFrench-language works237,207