Comprehensive Genomic and Transcript Profiling of CBL Gene in Childhood AML: A Report from Children's Oncology Group Studies AAML03P1, AAML0531 and COG/NCI Target AML Initiative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Casitas B-Lineage Lymphoma (CBL) gene encodes for an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets activated receptor tyrosine kinases for degradation. Mutations of the CBL gene have been described in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) but less is known about mutations and variants of CBL in de novo AML. We previously reported that somatic mutations of CBL are rare in pediatric AML. In this report we present a comprehensive evaluation of genomic and transcript variants of CBL including novel deletion events as well as transcript variants which, in combination with somatic mutations, account for over 6% of pediatric AML with extreme association with inv(16) and favorable outcome. Initial assessment of CBL transcript in a cohort of 100 patients identified previously reported deletion of exon 8 (CBL ΔE8, N=2) associated with CBL splice mutations as well as a novel whole exon 8 and 9 deletion variant (CBL ΔE8+9, N=3) without identifiable underlying somatic alterations. Long distance PCR, as well as custom Nanostring CNV array evaluation revealed a genomic deletion underlying this transcript variant. Subsequent whole genome sequencing as part of COG/NCI TARGET AML initiative, identified discrete genomic deletions of 1998, 3588 and 6189 bp across exon 8 and 9, leading to the generation of this novel variant. We evaluated the functional consequence of the novel CBL ΔE8+9 deletion variant by expressing it in IL3-dependent Ba/F3 cell line. Compared to control cells, Ba/F3 cells expressing CBL ΔE8+9 demonstrated cytokine independent growth. A comprehensive profiling of CBL variants was conducted in 796 pediatric de novo AML patients by transcript profiling (transcript variants) or by exome capture sequencing (somatic mutations including point mutations and smaller indels). All patients were treated on Children's Oncology Group studies AAML03P1 (N=167) and AAML0531 (N=629) and presence of CBL variants was correlated with disease characteristics and clinical outcome. Of the 796 patient specimens tested, 50 patients (6.3%) had one of 3 distinct CBL variants; transcript variant (N=28), somatic mutation (N=14), or dual transcript variant and somatic mutation (N=8). All cases of CBL ΔE8+9 were associated with a corresponding genomic deletion. Out of 14 cases of CBL ΔE8 and 1 case of CBL ΔE9, only 4 cases (27%) had a splice site mutation identified as the underlying mechanism of splice variant. Presence of CBL variants was correlated with clinical characteristics and outcome. Those with CBL variants had a significantly higher prevalence of inv(16) compared with CBL wild type (WT) (37% vs. 13%, p<0.001). This association differed by CBL variant type; 44% transcript variants and 50% dual variants had inv(16) compared to 14% somatic mutations and 13% CBL WT (p<0.001). NPMc+ was more prevalent in those with CBL somatic mutations (29%) than transcript variant (4%), dual variant (0%) or CBL WT (8%) (p=0.035). Similarly, genetic risk groups differed between CBL variants vs. WT (Low risk 70% vs 39%, p=<0.001; Standard risk 22% vs. 46%, p=0.001; High risk 8% vs. 15%, p=0.196). Clinical characteristics including gender, age, race and ethnicity were not significantly different. FAB morphologic assessment revealed an enrichment for the M4 subtype in CBL variant vs. WT (53% vs. 23%, P<.001) which is likely accounted for by the association of inv(16) with this morphologic group. Patients with CBL variants had a 100% clinical remission rate by end of induction II compared to 89% for CBL WT patients (p=0.014). Survival from study entry was similar between CBL mutant vs. WT patients (5 year OS 72% vs. 66%, p=0.24; 5 year EFS 61% vs. 50%, p=0.11). Due to the strong association of CBL mutation with core binding factor leukemia, we assessed whether CBL variant was prognostic of outcome within this favorable risk group, but there was no significant difference in outcomes. Variants of the CBL gene in pediatric AML include genetic mutations with and without whole exon deletions. These CBL variants are highly associated with low risk AML but do not provide independent risk prognosis. The cooperating events of CBL variants in core binding factor leukemia deserve greater study. Our initial analysis of the transcript variants in a cell line model suggest that these large exon 8+9 deletions represent important oncogenic events. The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the important contributions of the late Dr. Robert Arceci to the AML TARGET initiative. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".