MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563368366

Place-Conscious Pedagogy and Sackville, New Brunswick, as a Learning Community

2016· article· en· W2563368366 on OpenAlexaffabout
Erik W. Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Brunswick Studies / Revue d’études sur le Nouveau-Brunswick · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicOutdoor and Experiential Education
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSense of placeValue (mathematics)Sense of communityPlace attachmentNorm (philosophy)PedagogyMountGrounded theoryPlace-based educationSociologySocial psychologyPsychologyEpistemologySocial scienceEngineeringEnvironmental educationQualitative researchComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is growing support for the value of place-conscious pedagogy at the undergraduate level. It has found momentum in arguments that suggest regular interactions with one’s surroundings allow for knowledge to be practised while being learned. This case study investigates the delivery of Place Matters , a week-long intensive program delivered in Atlantic Canada, at Mount Allison University, that attempts to develop students’ sense of place within the university and surrounding community. Grounded in value-belief-norm (VBN) theory and the new ecological paradigm (NEP), this mixed-methods study employs questionnaires, post-program interviews, and direct observation methods. This study attempts to discover whether it is possible for students to significantly develop their sense of place during the course, to what extent students’ value and understand their sense of place, and how their developed sense of place has altered their understanding of the human relationship with the environment. It additionally proposes a link between sense of place and VBN theory, which leads to a further theoretical connection between place and the NEP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Brunswick Studies / Revue d’études sur le Nouveau-BrunswickSame topicOutdoor and Experiential EducationFrench-language works237,207