Особенности патологоанатомического исследования сердца у собак
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A methodology for post-mortem examination of heart in dogs taking into account the available literature data is presented. The sequence of the examination enables to diagnose various abnormalities. The features of the autopsy and examination of heart in large and small animals are described. Altogether, 43 dogs including 26 purebred and 17 mongrel dogs were examined. Pedigree dogs were presented by the following breeds: Malinois, German Shepherd, French Bulldog, Cocker Spaniel, Dachshund, Poodle, Pekingese, Doberman, Pomeranian, Central Asia Shepherd Dog, Caucasian Shepherd Dog, Pembroke Welsh Corgi and terriers. Of purebred dogs, males with heart diseases were prevalent among German Shepherd Dogs, French Bulldogs, Poodles and Central Asian Shepherd. As for mongrel dogs, females died more often than males. Dirofilariasis was diagnosed most often 26.9% and 35.3% in purebred and mongrel dogs, respectively. Enlarged right heart and pulmonary engorgement in mongrel dogs was detected in 17.6% cases, while in purebred dogs in 15.4% cases. Thrombosis in cardiac cavities, thrombosis in heart vessels, myocardosis, myocardial hypertrophy and myocardial infarction were found.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it