Grandir au camp. Diversité culturelle, convivialité et identité ethnique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le camp de réfugiés de Kakuma, au Kenya, est remarquable en raison de sa diversité culturelle. Des réfugiés d’une douzaine de pays y cohabitent. Cet article s’intéresse à la nature de cette coexistence et à ses effets sur l’identité ethnique de jeunes Somaliens qui ont grandi au camp. Nous soutenons ici qu’une culture conviviale s’y est développée, mais que l’ethnicité structure toujours la vie sociale. Nous soulignons ensuite que l’expérience du camp influence les appartenances des jeunes, et nous relevons que le camp peut être considéré comme un espace de résistance. Ce faisant, nous montrons que des notions tirées de la littérature sur la cohabitation interethnique dans les villes ou sur l’identité ethnique des immigrants sont pertinentes pour comprendre l’expérience des réfugiés dans les camps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".