MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563594505

Основные пути развития фразеологизмов в североамериканском континууме современного английского языка

2012· article· ru· W2563594505 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
М. В. Бондаренко, Ю. Р. Фахрутдинова

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Самарского университета. История, педагогика, филология · 2012
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLexicography and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnthropocentrismLinguisticsSlangMeaning (existential)Word formationSociologyPhilosophyEpistemologyEnvironmental ethics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to the study of modern trends in development of phraseological units belonging to different layers of spoken American and Canadian English. Having for their main source slang and colloquialisms, new phrases are marked by a high degree of anthropocentricity as their thematic sphere is restricted by human environment, man’s physical state, behaviour, morals. Structurally the given units are predominantly binominal word combinations, whose one or two centres possess an anthropocentric meaning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueВестник Самарского университета. История, педагогика, филологияSame topicLexicography and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207