MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563600264 · doi:10.1080/15567036.2011.621010

A New Assisted History Matching Approach for Complex Reservoirs

2015· article· en· W2563600264 on OpenAlexaff
Tiffany Dang, Zhangxin Chen, T. B. N. Nguyen, Wisup Bae, Thi Ha Phuong Phung

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMatching (statistics)Convergence (economics)Computer scienceSimplex algorithmField (mathematics)Mathematical optimizationGradient descentInverseRate of convergenceProduction (economics)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionGeologyPetroleum engineeringAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligenceLinear programmingStatisticsArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes the integration of mathematical models (Simplex and steepest descent algorithm) with global modification (through deeply geological studies) to increase the efficiency of history matching. This method can take full advantage of the gradient-based method (fast rate of convergence) and guarantee of finding a global minimum for inverse problems. The above method is applied to the Lower Miocene reservoir at White Tiger field, a highly heterogeneous reservoir, which has been producing under a naturally edge-water mechanism. A model that covers the upper formation of White Tiger field with 27 production wells and 8 injection wells is conditioned to 23 years of production history. The new assisted history matching approach provides an excellent match between simulation results and production data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental EffectsSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207