Lymphocyte Recovery At Day 28 Post-Transplant Is Predictive Of Relapse In Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Transplanted With Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The impact of lymphocyte recovery on post- transplant outcomes has been suggested but has not been evaluated in a homogeneous population of AML patients. The present study attempted to evaluate the impact of lymphocyte recovery at 28 days post-HCT in a homogeneous population of 212 patients with AML that underwent HCT between 1999 and 2011 at the Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada. All patients in the study group received peripheral blood stem cells as a graft source. Patients were divided into two groups: those with absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) ≥0.5x109/L (n=122, 57%) and those with ALC <0.5x109/L (n=90, 43%), at day 28 post-transplant. Median age of all patients was 49 years (range 18-70), 102 patients (48%) were female. HCT was performed in first complete remission (CR1) for 134 patients (63%) and second complete remission (CR2) for 78 patients (37%). Cytogenetics at diagnosis were available in 189 patients (89%). Donors were matched related (n=145, 68%) or matched unrelated (n=67, 32%). Myeloablative conditioning was administered to 131 (62%) patients, 81 (38%) received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens. Median follow up duration among survivors was 49 months (range 7-120 months). Univariate analysis demonstrated overall survival (OS) was significantly different in favor of the group with ALC ≥0.5x109/L vs those with ALC <0.5x109/L (p=0.016) with a 3-year OS of 57% vs 39% respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower in the group with ALC ≥0.5x109/L vs those with the ALC <0.5x109/L (p=0.0002), with a 3-year CIR of 16% vs 37% respectively (Figure). Cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) were not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.22). Multivariable analysis for OS and NRM did not demonstrate ALC ≥0.5x109/L at 28 days post-transplant to be an independent prognostic factor. Multivariable analysis for CIR demonstrated that ALC ≥0.5x109/L at 28 days post-transplant is an independent prognostic factor decreasing the risk of relapse compared to ALC <0.5x109/L (p=0.015, HR=0.47, 95%CI=0.25-0.86), which implies that early lymphocyte recovery suggests lower risk of relapse post-transplant. Significant decrease in CIR was also seen with the occurrence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (p=0.00002, HR=0.29, 95%CI=0.16-0.51), while increased CIR was associated with the use of RIC regimens (p=0.03, HR=1.9, 95%CI=1.1-3.5). The present study concludes that lymphocyte recovery with ALC ≥0.5x109/L at day 28 post transplant is associated with decreasing risk of relapse in a homogeneous population of AML patients that underwent allogeneic peripheral blood HCT, but without overall survival benefit. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".