MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563650663

논문 : 다문화주의 음악교육론과 국악 교육

2000· article· ko· W2563650663 on OpenAlex
권덕원

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue음악과 문화 · 2000
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Safety, and Science Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnic groupMusic educationSociologyCultural diversityMeaning (existential)AestheticsPedagogyPsychologySocial scienceAnthropologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The philosophy of multi-cultural music education has more and more increased its influence on some Western countries such as U.S.A. and Canada. This trend is not so strange because their students come from various ethnic groups. In addition, the development of ethno-musical study has supported the philosophy. Korean people have the same ethnic origin, use the same language, and enjoy the common culture. Korean students, however, need to know and experience other ethnic cultures because the world of today is increasingly getting near. Each country seems to be very difficult to exist without understanding other countries and their cultures. If then, what meaning does the philosophy of multi-cultural music education have in the context of the recent Korean music education? I tried to figure out the theoretical background of the multi-cultural education and the meaning for the music education of Korea, specifically, in terms of Korean music teaching through this study. Some people who support the multi-cultural education mentioned the equity among various ethnic cultures. For instance David Elliott insisted that any ethnic group`s culture, even European music, should not be the center of music curriculum. However, it is not possible for music teachers to deal with various music equally because of teachers` cultural limits. It is believed that a music teacher`s understanding shows a certain center which reflects his or her cultural background. For instance, although a Canadian music teacher may try to do the best in applying the ideal of multi-cultural equity, there might be Canadian music in the center of his or her lessons since he or she still lives in Canadian musical culture. Same thing will happen for a Korean music teacher. What are the implications of the multi-culturalism for Korean music education? First, Korean music educators need to understand the meaning of the multi-cultural approach in a specific context of Korean culture. Second, we need to recognize that Korean music will be the center of curriculum in the school music classes. Third, the development of Korean music is a responsibility of Korean people in the 21st century of the world. Fourth, the education of Korean music should be strengthen in general music classes. Fifth, proper equipment and instructional materials of Korean music should be prepared. Finally, Korean government needs to create a new educational system through which Korean music teachers can introduce Korean music not only to Korean children in foreign countries but also to other countries` people.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it